More on the instruction to decrease internet use

(Posted by Cynthia Bourgeault on Facebook, March 24, 2020.)
 
As I expected, I am receiving plenty of raised cyber-eyebrows about my instruction 3 in yesterday’s posting, to “radically decrease or discontinue altogether your use of internet technology to support social distancing.” Please don’t jump to the conclusion that I am calling for an immediate cold turkey here: more like a gentle challenging of some assumptions we’ve all bought into a bit too automatically, and a phased step-down as we learn to shift to the REAL network of global intercommunion.
 
I continue to believe that the only authentic “worldwide web” exists in the Imaginal realm: i.e., in that subtler and quantumly more powerful bandwidth of energetic communion which links not only all beings of this planet, but also beings in all realms, including those on the other side of the life/death “divide.” It is from here that we receive our help—and it is here, too, that we give it! it is where our real human contribution to calming the inflamed heart of our planet can be must efficaciously offered.
 
This is in fact the subject of my forthcomng book, which ironically would have had its maiden teaching voyage next week at Valle Crucis. It elucidates the part I believe we Wisdom students can most fruitfully contribute to the present planetary upheaval. But playing that part is counterintuitive and it is a learned skill.
 
My invitation as I invited you to consider slowly weaning yourself from the internet is to do so proportionately as you re-boot your innate skills for imaginal communion (skills, incidentally, that have been vigorously discouraged and numbed in our contemporary Western culture. ) The problem with the internet zoom groups as an antidote to physical gathering is that they are a simulacrum, substituting fellowship and information exchange for authentic communion and gnosis. We are losing not only our skills for but our taste for the real deal, and the continued electromagnetizing of our planetary atmosphere by this sudden surge in “social distancing”-motivated electronic communication is aggravating the conditions in which the covid-19 virus spreads. Call me a nutcase here, but disregard at your own peril!
 
So if some of you are inclined to take me up on this wager and boost your component of “imaginal bandwidth” participation during this pres crisis and beyond it, how do you go about doing that? Traditionally, of course, this teaching was transmitted only one-on-one; from initiated teacher to prepared student. That it is how it was transmitted to me by my own teacher Rafe. I categorically refuse to put it out there in the form of an online course! But I am willing to share some general orientation, and perhaps a few specific suggestions for those of you who want to take it to the next step.
 
First of all, a little general theory:
First and foremost, in this vast inter-realmic cosmos (meaning not just this physical earth, but all cosmoses and planes of consciousness in this great eclosion of divine purposiveness we call the created order), all hearts—all individual lives and beings—are merged and flow out of that great ocean of life. Our individual beings participate in this individually, but always AS AN EMERGENT PROPERTY OF THE WHOLE. Our individual life is an instantiation of that one divine life. And because of this, we can always find one another. We are never out of contact. There are no walls,; there are no barriers.
 
But to see this and work with it, we must move beyond our automatic human orientation toward “the individual” as designating a specific corporeal unit with a fixed identity and position in space and time. As long as we insist on that orientation, we wind up in necromancy, not intercommunion. To be fully present in communion with a beloved, whether in another corner of this world or in another world altogether, we must ironically completely let go of that beloved as an object, and allow his or her heart to wash gently upon us like waves of the ocean washing gently on the shore. Any attempt to make precise will result immediately in engaging the personal imagination and will; the whole exchange immediately degenerates into illusion and sentimentality. A very delicate touch is required, and this is where the learning curve comes in.
 
We are really talking about stabilizing in ourselves a higher state of being, exactly in line with Mauric Nicoll’s celebrated dictum, “As your being increases, your receptivity to higher meaning increases. As your being decreases, the old meanings return.” (Psychological Commentaries, 1245). This higher level of being, which accesses the imaginal bandwidth not by raiding it but by MATCHING it, has traditionally been known in Christian spirituality as ‘vigilance’ or “recollection.” It is a higher bandwidth of spiritual attentiveness, in which imaginal intercommunion becomes possible.
 
To do this requires spiritual work on self. It is not a technique that can be taught, but a transformation that must be undergone. Gurdjieff called it “Being partkdolg duty:” our obligatory human contribution to the planetary wellbeing, whose twin pillars are conscious labor and intentional suffering. Only in the refiners’ fire of these two foundational practices (which are actually foundational attitudes) do we gradually attain to purity of heart—which, remember, is the precondition, according to Jesus, for “seeing God.”
 
Each of the four instructions I offered you yesterday are building blocks for stabilizing these foundational underpinnings of imaginal seeing. I will circle back in a forthcoming post to unpack a little bit more of the “how,” But this should serve to get you started.
 
By the way, Jacques Lusseyran gets this exactly. Check out AND THERE WAS LIGHT, pages 259-60.
8 replies
  1. Judy Songer
    Judy Songer says:

    Reading “The Wisdom Jesus” right now.
    Also watching Cynthia on YouTube and establishing my centering prayer practice. I’m definitely feeling more
    lightness in my being and a quiet joy. Thank you!

    Reply
  2. Sarah Schwartz
    Sarah Schwartz says:

    Cynthia, I am reading now and would like to receive your posts. I know the Inner Net is real because I experience it in my lived reality. I am also follower of Fr. Richard Rohr’s work since the late 1980s .
    Thank you kindly. Blessings, Sarah

    Reply
  3. Donna Hughes
    Donna Hughes says:

    I totally agree with you about the internet. It is a useful tool, but all too easily becomes an escape which soaks up time and resolve to do more serious things that are difficult to begin. I do envy you your isolation, but know it would take a really big dose of transition!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.